wp-paginate
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/vegaspifirm/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114rocket
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/vegaspifirm/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114wordpress-seo
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/vegaspifirm/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114<\/p>\n
Many people have heard the term \u201cpunitive damages\u201d and want to know how it applies to their personal injury or car accident claim in Las Vegas. \u201cPunitive damages\u201d is an amount that is awarded by a jury to punish a party in a civil lawsuit. This term is also sometimes called \u201cexemplary damages,\u201d as the award is intended to set an example. Punitive or exemplary damages is usually contrasted with compensatory damages, which are intended to make an accident victim whole again. Compensatory damages usually include medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, and lost enjoyment of life.<\/p>\n
Punitive damages cannot be awarded in most cases. For a personal injury plaintiff to even be able a jury for punitive damages, the plaintiff must show that the defendant was more than negligent. Negligence generally means careless. In other words, to be able to ask for punitive damages, a plaintiff must show that a defendant was more than careless. In Nevada, usually, this means showing that a defendant acted intentionally, recklessly, or with intent to do harm. In car accident cases, punitive damages usually do not apply but may apply in drunk driving cases<\/a>. It should also apply to cases where a defendant was texting and driving.<\/p>\n In the McDonald\u2019s coffee cup case<\/a> that a lot of people seem to know about, the biggest portion of the jury\u2019s award was the punitive damages. The jury in that case awarded $2.7 million against McDonalds. The large jury award in the case upset many people. Those people tend to refer to the McDonald\u2019s case as an example of a frivolous lawsuit where the accident victim became rich. However, the purpose of that $2.7 million award was to punish McDonalds. The plaintiff\u2019s attorney in that case showed that McDonalds served their coffee at temperatures higher than other restaurants. They also showed that, in a decade, McDonalds received about 700 complaints of people suffering burns from their coffee. In awarding punitive damages against McDonalds, the jury believed that McDonalds needed to be punished for their policy and deterred from continuing to follow this policy.<\/p>\n In Nevada, the legislature enacted laws that governs when punitive damages can be awarded. Those laws can be found in Chapter 42 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS)<\/a>. Under NRS \u00a7 42.005, a jury may award punitive damages against a defendant who \u201chas been guilty of oppression, fraud or malice, express or implied.\u201d NRS \u00a7 42.001 defines these terms as follows:<\/p>\n NRS \u00a7\u200242.001.\u2002Definitions; exceptions.\u2002As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires and except as otherwise provided in subsection 5 of NRS 42.005:<\/p>\n The Nevada legislature also limited how much punitive damages can be awarded in most cases. Subsection (1) of NRS \u00a7 42.005 limits the amount of punitive damage awards as follows:<\/p>\n (a)\u2002Three times the amount of compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiff if the amount of compensatory damages is $100,000 or more; or<\/p>\n (b)\u2002Three hundred thousand dollars if the amount of compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiff is less than $100,000.<\/p>\n The above limitation on punitive damages do not apply to product defect or product liability cases and to insurance bad faith cases, amongst others. See NRS \u00a7 42.005(2)<\/a>.<\/p>\n In a recent Las Vegas medical malpractice case<\/a>, a jury assessed $8 million in punitive damages against a local hand surgeon<\/a>. The jury found that the hand surgeon had committed fraud. The plaintiff, a U.S. Air Force pilot, claimed that the surgeon performed a procedure that was not the standard of care. In fact, the plaintiff presented expert testimony that no other hand surgeon ever performed or would have performed the same procedure. The plaintiff also argued that the surgeon performed the procedure in order to guarantee that the plaintiff will require future procedures, for which the surgeon can financially benefit.<\/p>\n In a product liability lawsuit, plaintiffs alleged that a drug manufacturer sold hormone replacement therapy drugs that increased the risk of getting breast cancer and failed to adequately warn its customers. The jury found that the defendant guilty of malice or fraud, and a separate trial was held on the question of how much the punitive damage award should be. Following that separate trial, the jury awarded a total of $99 million in punitive damages against the defendant. See Wyeth v. Rowatt<\/em>, 126 Nev. 446, 244 P.3d 765 (Nev. 2010).<\/p>\nNevada Law On Punitive Damages<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
Examples of Punitive Damage Awards in Nevada<\/h3>\n